sopsi         

Loading

A. Palma, P. Pancheri - Vol. 6, Dicembre 2000, num.4

Testo Immagini Bibliografia Summary Riassunto Indice

Costrutti Teorici ed Obiettività clinico-sperimentale dell'intervento terapeutico nelle Depressioni Minori, "Sintomatiche Subcliniche" o "Subsindromiche"
Theoretical constructs and clinical-experimental objectivity of therapeutic intervention in Minor,
"Sub-clinical Symptomatic" or "Sub-syndromal" Depressions

Background and objectives
Reference criteria to decide whether to treat or not sub-clinical depressions, and the threshold for such treatment are currently unclear. Our paper aims at offering some reflections on the indications and contraindications of various therapeutic interventions proposed for "Subsyndromal Depressions", otherwise called "Sub-clinical Symptomatic Depression" (SSD) or "Minor Depressions". After a brief summary of general indications established according to international guidelines for the psychological or biological (somatic) treatment of depressive disorders, the concept of normal vs. pathological in psychiatry to decide therapeutic threshold is dealt with, with particular reference to the clinical features of Sub-syndromal Depression. Finally, some considerations are made on some experimental data and clinical criteria of antidepressant drug efficacy of molecules most frequently used in the treatment of SSD. For the sake of completeness, reference is made also to the efficacy of some psychotherapies and to the "clinical role" of some currently widely used phytotherapeutic preparations.

Method
To define drug choice criteria in "Minor" e "Sub-syndromal" depressions, we took into account data in literature relative to the potency/tolerability ratio of the main antidepressant molecules, which we considered here on the basis of their neurotransmitter systems orientation, according to a clinical dimensional approach. The drug choice that empirically showed the best efficacy proved, in fact, to be one that does consider essentially a diagnostic "category", but that instead assesses the dominant symptomatology, symptoms associated with comorbidity and other clinical parameters with a manifest dimensional connotation.

Results and conclusions
In minor and sub-syndromal depressions, the definition of the biological substrate and trait is given priority as regards the most adequate pharmacodynamic profile to the patient’s temperament and clinical history. Data in literature agree in indicating the most well-tolerated antidepressant molecules. Antidepressant drug safety and tolerability are factors of the utmost importance for ensuring therapeutic continuity. According to some authors, these two pharmacodynamic characteristics allow for a greater control of the risk of recurrences, of clinical pictures of increased severity, often chronic and with suicidal tendency, which specially in SSD, is unpredictable. In fact, suicide has been frequently described in subjects with family history positive for psychiatric disorders and affected by recurrent minor depression or in cases of mild depression with associated anxiety and/or severe somatic disorders. Unfortunately, studies published on this topic are scanty and most controlled studies on the biological treatment of SSD regards the use of 5-HT agonists. According to these data, the therapeutic option to prefer is that with a demonstrated high tolerability, hence regards drugs with a prevalent serotonergic activity, slow-release antidepressant preparations or substances with a "paraphysiological" mechanism of action, such as sulpho-adenosine methionine (SAMe). Furthermore, low initial doses and drugs with rapid onset of activity are indicated. In patients with sub-syndromal depressive features, the study of "target dimensional areas" and premorbid temperamental structure is a modality that showed reduced risk of stimulating individual biological susceptibility and that generally increases compliance to drug prescription. Regarding psychological intervention, some meta-analytical studies point at a greater effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural psychotherapies with respect to insight-oriented (psychodynamic/psychoanalytical) psychotherapies. Furthermore, it appears that the combination of a psychological and a biological therapy increases antidepressant drug compliance; in fact, in some cases, somatic side effect complaints are reduced. Generally, psychotherapy is indicated in mild depressive forms provided that psychotic aspects, recurrent course of the disorder or melancholic traits with suicide risk are not present. It should be underlined that despite the great current demand for phytotherapeutic compounds, side effects related to their use remain unclear as well as their minimal effective and optimal doses for multiple conditions of "non-specific upset".