P. Pancheri, R. Delle Chiaie, G. Boissard - Vol. 6, Marzo 2000, num.1
Testo Immagini Bibliografia Summary Riassunto Indice
Studio di Inter-rater reliability
sui punteggi ham-d tra gli sperimentatori degli studi multicentrici mc-3 ed
mc-4 per la valutazione dell’efficacia e della tollerabilità della same
nel trattamento della depressione maggiore
Interrater reliability of HAM-D scores among investigators of the MC-3
and MC-4 multicenter efficacy and safety studies of sulfoadenosylmethionine
in the treatment of major depression
1 Thompson C.
The instruments of Psychiatric Research.
New York: Wiley 1989.
2 Rush AJ, Gullion CM, Raskin A, Kellner R, Bartko JJ.
Assessment and measurement of Clinical Change.
In : RF Prien, DS Robinson, eds. Clinical evaluation of psychotropic
drugs. New York: Raven Press 1994.
3 Dunn G.
Design and analysis of reliability studies. The statistical evaluation
of measurement errors.
London E Arnold 1989.
4 Fleiss JL.
Balanced incomplete blocks designs for inter-rater reliability studies.
Applied Psychological Measures 1981;5:105-112.
5 Fleiss JL.
The design and analysis of clinical experiments.
New York: Wiley 1986.
6 Hamilton M.
Rating Scale for Depression.
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1960;23:56-62.
7 Hamilton M.
Standardised assessment of depressive symptoms.
Psychiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery 1969;72:201-205.
8 Knesevich JW, Biggs JT, Clayton PJ.
Validity of the Hamilton rating scale for depression.
British Journal of Psychiatry 1977;131:49-52.
9 Bech P, Allerup P, Gram LF, Reisby N.
The Hamilton Depression Scale: Evaluation and objectivity using logistic
models.
Acta Psichiatrica Scandinavica 1981;63:290-299.
10 Hedlund JL, Vieweg BW.
The Hamilton rating scale for depression: a comprehensive review.
Journal of Operational Psychiatry 1979;10:149-165.
11 Kearns NP, Cruickshank CA, McGuigan KJ.
A comparison of Depression rating Scales.
British Journal of Psychiatry 1982;141:45-49.