sopsi         

Loading

G.P. DONÀ, F. MICHELUZZI, V.MORO - Vol. 10, March 2004, Issue 1

Testo Immagini Bibliografia Summary Indice

Normalità e patologia psichiatrica: quale differenza? Un’analisi statistica
sulle scale Fondamentali e di Contenuto del test MMPI-2
Normality and Psychiatric Pathology: what is the difference?
A statistical analysis on the Fundamental and Content Scales of the MMPI-2 test

Aim

The research aims to verify if the scales of MMPI-2, both Fundamental and content, can discriminate the subjects in a normal condition, in a non-psychiatric condition and in an overt psychiatric condition.
According with our initial hypothesis, the group of psychiatric patients would score higher on the scales referring to pathological symptoms (F, D, Pd, Pa, Pt, Sc scales), while the group of non-psychiatric hospitalized patients should score higher on some content scales like ANX, FRS, HEA, and ANG; for the nomal subjects, the scores in basic scales and in content scales should not be particularly off-range.

Methods

We considered the MMPI protocols we had and we limited three litle samples, the more possible homogeneous in number, sex, age and level of education (medim-high cultural level). In total the subjects are 51, divided in: 17 normal subjects (7 men and 10 women), 17 non psychiatric hospitalized subjects (7 men and 10 women) and 17 subjects with an evident psychiatric pathology (7 men and 10 women).
The test was administered at the 3rd Psychiatric Service of the Hospital of Padua for the psychiatric patients and at other wards of the same Hospital of Padua for the hospitalized group. The normal subjects are constituted by a certain number of colleagues, university students and professionals.
For the statistical analysis we used these methods: analysis of variance and method of Scheffé.

Results

The statistical analysis has revealed a substantial difference, from the sample, in almost all Fundamental scales, except the L scale; the highest values were observed in the F, K, D, Pd, Pa, Pt, and Sc scales, with p = .000. In the Fundamental scales F, K, D, Hy, Pd, Pa, Pt, Sc, Si, the comparison between the normal sample and the non-psychiatric hospitalized one showed no significant differences, while in these variables the psychiatric group scored higher than the other two groups.
In the Ma scale the psychiatric subjects scored higher than the hospitalized ones who, in turn, scored higher than normal controls.
Regarding the fifteen content scales, all the scales are significant, except FRS, CYN and ASP. The highest values were observed on the ANX, OBS, DEP, BIZ, ANG, LSE, WRK, TRT with p = .000. Also for the content scales ANX, OBS, DEP, HEA, BIZ, ANG, TPA, LSE, SOD, FAM, WRK, TRT the comparison between the normal sample and the non-psychiatric hospitalized one yielded no significant differences, while in these variables the psychiatric subjects scored higher than the other two groups.

Conclusions

In concusion, results confirm a positive discriminative ability of the MMPI-2 test according to the presence or absence of overt psychiatric morbidity, since it seems that the group influences the answers given to the Fundamental scales and those of content that proved to be significant. In the psychiatric patients the significantly higher score in the F scale can be interpreted as a sign of the current psychopathological suffering. The lower score in the validity K scale associated with mental illness seems in tune with what is described in literature: the psychiatric subjects have a fragile Ego without effective defences. Instead, it seems that the normal subjects face the MMPI-2 using more strict defences, while the hospitalized group is in an intermediate position between the other two groups. The psychiatric subjects score significantly higher on the scales referring to pathological symptoms (D, Hy, Pd, Pa, Pt, Sc, Si); the high scores in the Hs, D, Hy scales show the presence of a neurotic component that renders the psychopathological profile "softer".Psychiatric subjects score significantly higher on the basic scale Ma; this could be interpreted as showing increased mental productivity, physical agitation and emotional arousal.In the content scales that proved to be significant for the "group" (ANX, OBS, DEP, HEA, BIZ, ANG, TPA, LSE, SOD, FAM, WRK, TRT), the psychiatric group scored significantly higher than the other two groups; instead, there is no substantial difference between the hospitalized subjects and the normal ones. These scales seem sensitive to the presence of a psychopathological profile; in the normal and non-psychiatric subjects these variables could indicate favourable personality characteristics.